Technique 1: "Give examples."
Exercise:Bad prompt:
Example-improved prompt - compare the different outcomes:
Adding another layer of specifity by explaining the example might look as follows – compare the outcomes of all three... Do you see a quality boost for each one? Make a claim on nutrition that might be seen as controversial by health experts, for example ‘Chocolate is good for you.’. This example is controversial, becausechocolate is often seen as unhealthy by health experts, because of its usually high sugar contents, while others claim that its release of endorphines upon consumption outweighs its health disasvantages.” |
Technique 2: "Role play: Use personas & scenarios."
Exercise:Try the following prompt:
Now, try your own directing skills - create a prompt that uses roles or a scenario. What outcomes do you get? Do you think this approach approved the GenAI's response, compared to a similar one without roles? |
Technique 3: "Use AI to generate or improve prompts."
Exercise:Ask the Chatbot of your choice to create a prompt, optimized for a task. Images are a good starting point. For example (this meta-prompt was used as a starting point for generating the image featured in today's workshop invitation):
Come up with your own task, that you would like a 'perfect prompt' for. Maybe explore tasks other than image generation. How do those AI-prompts work out for you? → Next, repeat your exploration of the technique with the following versions of AI-assisted prompt design ("Refine your own prompts using AI"; "Ask the GenAI tool, if and how it understands your prompt"). Can you improve your outcomes that way?
|
Technique 4: "Break down complex tasks."
Exercise:Bad prompt:
Improved prompt (here → a prompt chain, each numerated sub-task representing a follow-up prompt):
Continue breaking down the original task into sub-tasks/follow-up-prompts. Try both versions –the original one, and the prompt chain you created from it – and compare. How did the outcome change? |
Technique 5: "Mark-up your input."
Exercise:Prompt improved earlier through specifying output parameters:
Can we boost it even further? Let's try:
Compare results - did the mark-up help to improve the outcome, or not measurably? |
Technique 6: "Combine GenAI use with external data sources."
|